The Sanctions Thread

Chit chat.
Hawkpeter
Posts: 345
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2022 7:17 am

Re: The Sanctions Thread

Post by Hawkpeter »

This article references the Rio re-analysis program beginning in 2023.

https://ita.sport/news/olympic-games-ri ... LocFNBSi7w
strapping
Site Admin
Posts: 647
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2022 7:46 am

Re: The Sanctions Thread

Post by strapping »

polaris417
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2026 4:01 pm

Re: The Sanctions Thread

Post by polaris417 »

strapping wrote: Wed Jan 28, 2026 5:31 am https://ita.sport/news/the-ita-notifies ... violation/

Adiols (point and laugh).

2 Nov test date is in competition - Page 113 of U23 EWF champs (not on IWF website)
5 compounds! In competition! Not even trying to be smart about it lol.
erpel
Posts: 385
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2022 3:42 pm

Re: The Sanctions Thread

Post by erpel »

Hawkpeter wrote: Thu Jan 22, 2026 7:12 pm This article references the Rio re-analysis program beginning in 2023.
Man, 2016 feels like a lifetime ago. In a way that 2008-2016 didn't. All this tinkering with team sizes, qualification and of course categories (eugh) was detrimental, when doping was supposedly the impetus.
brian.degennaro
Posts: 82
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2022 3:19 am

Re: The Sanctions Thread

Post by brian.degennaro »

At this point, I think retests are pointless and lame. I am for improving the technology and sensitivity but to strip athletes of results many years later, and after retirement for many, is stupid. Use the samples to improve technology, send a letter of warning to the athletes and federations that this shit would not fly under current technology, and ban athletes going forward within a reasonable time and not two or three quads later.
strapping
Site Admin
Posts: 647
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2022 7:46 am

Re: The Sanctions Thread

Post by strapping »

https://ita.sport/news/the-ita-reports- ... igibility/

Presumably her defence was successful. It's a much more believable case than many of these defences (mesterolone, S-23 etc.)
erpel
Posts: 385
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2022 3:42 pm

Re: The Sanctions Thread

Post by erpel »

As it falls outside of LA28 qualification I don't think anyone in ECU is bothered by this suspension.
strapping
Site Admin
Posts: 647
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2022 7:46 am

Re: The Sanctions Thread

Post by strapping »

Hawkpeter
Posts: 345
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2022 7:17 am

Re: The Sanctions Thread

Post by Hawkpeter »

Some scrutiny of Georgia's NADO has revealed some serious issues.

https://www.wada-ama.org/en/news/wadas- ... rgian-anti
strapping
Site Admin
Posts: 647
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2022 7:46 am

Re: The Sanctions Thread

Post by strapping »

Post Reply